From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261522AbVFEIVa (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jun 2005 04:21:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261531AbVFEIVa (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jun 2005 04:21:30 -0400 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147]:49537 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261522AbVFEIVP (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jun 2005 04:21:15 -0400 Subject: Re: patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez , Daniel Walker , Oleg Nesterov In-Reply-To: <20050605081835.GA20981@elte.hu> References: <1117930633.20785.239.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <20050605081835.GA20981@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: linutronix Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 10:21:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1117959708.20785.245.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 10:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > 5. [...] > > #6 looks pretty significant too: > > > unsigned plist_chprio(struct plist *plist, struct plist *pl, int new_prio) > > { > > - if (new_prio == plist->prio) > > + if (new_prio == pl->prio) > > return 0; > > right? > Yes, forgot to rant about that :) tglx