From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dluq9-0001D2-KR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:31:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dluq1-00017m-9s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:31:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dluq0-0000yD-5x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:31:44 -0400 Received: from [69.17.117.24] (helo=mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DlumK-00018L-P8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:27:57 -0400 Received: from dsl081-088-222.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.111.2]) ([64.81.88.222]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Jun 2005 20:24:11 -0000 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Build environment image From: "John R. Hogerhuis" In-Reply-To: <009601c578f0$f4c67c60$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e> References: <20050621042844.GA13691@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <002001c5767e$818808a0$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e> <20050621194553.GA3898@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <42B87961.4080206@astolat-it.co.uk> <42BC4084.5000304@astolat-it.co.uk> <1119635339.23680.181.camel@aragorn> <009601c578f0$f4c67c60$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:25:13 -0700 Message-Id: <1119644713.766.9.camel@aragorn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: jhoger@pobox.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 14:13 -0500, jeebs@yango.us wrote: > "John R. Hogerhuis" > > > BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access > > to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to > > contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work. > > Does the ReactOS build work well enough to do Mingw etc. development? > > I can't say. But even if it were, I'd guess most here would rather work under Unix-like OS. > I know you were talking about testing etc., but I was thinking that way you > could have a window'ish environment to do some of the building. > > You wouldn't have to do a linux cross compile which might introduce some > other issues or mask some Win32 host build problem. Nothing wrong with cross compiling, really. Get full power of any necessary GNU utilities, editors, etc. in their "native environment." The only trouble is getting mingw, library dependencies, etc. set up in the first place, and having a standard build image or Live CD is one possible solution to that problem. -- John.