From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261502AbVFZR1b (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:27:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261490AbVFZR1a (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:27:30 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:47046 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261496AbVFZR0q (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:26:46 -0400 Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins From: Alan Cox To: David Masover Cc: Horst von Brand , Hans Reiser , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ReiserFS List In-Reply-To: <42BCCC32.1090802@slaphack.com> References: <200506231924.j5NJOvLA031008@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <42BB31E9.50805@slaphack.com> <1119570225.18655.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42BB7B32.4010100@slaphack.com> <1119612849.17063.105.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42BCCC32.1090802@slaphack.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1119806605.28649.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:23:26 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sad, 2005-06-25 at 04:14, David Masover wrote: > Right, but even if I was a door geek, changing hinges costs more than > changing code. Now, if I were building a new house and I happened to Probably not, programmers are expensive 8) > DVDs are cheap nowdays: > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16817502002 > Ok, you might need two of those. Still, it's not much, unless that's At least four because the media decay patterns are not well understood. So you need raid DVD too 8) > > 1. It must work > > 2. It must be clean code that follows the kernel style > > 3. It must not break other stuff > > 4. It needs a maintainer who won't get bored 12 months later and only > > support reiser5 > It's #2 and #3 that I'm worried about. #4 is a little unfair, and I can > verify that #1 is satisfied. Please review the 2.5 history of reiserfs3 if you believe so