From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147] helo=mail.tglx.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1E6BYf-0002lI-5h for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:25:39 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ashwin Chaugule In-Reply-To: <43068933.1080609@aftek.com> References: <430675EB.9030905@aftek.com> <1124457591.23647.382.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <43068933.1080609@aftek.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:25:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1124475944.23647.389.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: is this a bug ? Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 07:06 +0530, Ashwin Chaugule wrote: > > > In 2.6.12-2 my cmdline is .. >>From your previous mail > Im using 2.4.19-rmk7-pxa1, on a pxa255. ..... > > After digging into init/do_mounts.c , I found root_mountflags was by > default readonly, So what ? You were asking a question about 2.4.19 and you got an answer related to that. It's coded that way in the ancient, broken and obsolete 2.4.19... kernel and there are two ways to solve that without hacking the kernel code. Where is the bug ? tglx