From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030200AbVLMUPb (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:15:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751370AbVLMUPb (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:15:31 -0500 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:60392 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbVLMUPb (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:15:31 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rt22 From: john stultz To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <1134181771.4002.4.camel@leatherman> References: <1134172105.12624.27.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <1134181771.4002.4.camel@leatherman> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:15:19 -0800 Message-Id: <1134504919.3323.2.camel@leatherman> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 18:29 -0800, john stultz wrote: > If you add a "return 0;" to the top of > verify_pmtmr_rate() in drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c does the acpi_pm > timer keep proper time? Hey Fernando, You replied to my other question, but I haven't heard anything back about the one above. If you have time to test this, I'd really appreciate it. thanks again! -john