From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1832C433E0 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25AE861601 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 25AE861601 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.76405.137854 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rKP-0000NI-QJ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:13 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 76405.137854; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rKP-0000NB-Mz; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:13 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 76405; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:11 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l4rKN-0000N6-Jt for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:11 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (unknown [2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id f3b7477d-9bce-4156-8c47-28ba41923ade; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id f19so3665173ljn.5 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([212.22.223.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 194sm752235lfk.292.2021.01.27.12.22.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:22:09 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: f3b7477d-9bce-4156-8c47-28ba41923ade DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Gz3oLTrs8uV2CuakAJhcgOvEGqa7e+CgZRM1sKZsDK4=; b=p8+BxN7ZEWSbYI2Vp9e9eLplbKFilCypu0mEhlvlHUpk50+2Qj9Xv3fvaL+FyifgXP VZuhexXNUJjfu0pEZjyNf8VGovbtE/GBG6sp+fWwWcS7C13k4C6o6ohq/J6biU+t3JtZ vNrjirCLXuMAqNSeu7vc4GgUuYzzGOsRX69CQ/dB1wt4f0BwPCKoEvO0OJIuXf/j4cps Dl8MJmagpf8+Np9NkPHwB2U61zHlj/OJWB5cCELofOvLIg/KmwRLcJYJero2q61LOS/M gRJP8YtMC4gsEErOoueqDYctvwcQc7al03yBvSH1px4rDDxbgD7dnBmTC+2GF+SqFD19 fC1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Gz3oLTrs8uV2CuakAJhcgOvEGqa7e+CgZRM1sKZsDK4=; b=iYWIWoFbvrd9rgXMDJ+BbtpBHUI0WWqCbkZY47XEX3ISJZHBQEv9Jj8mWxWOGp71th /xYYw+7ANNKdKIIldGZ5JKK6BvtHcBa9WQLTnSTqgzbbjvFCYFICibcekGT6IgHbb6W/ lCr59w/xMB3v8p+M/ll3waPsycSg9lvtH4m3BSM3/I3Jm+MgQHcUqjpAqhlGwylYL6yx W8kwseiwJK5U0MyG7SOacpyROHqQbf+MD6zbri7io6/rtGW8mdbCK9LpGYSTkBr563Gv CZOv68WNpoA+7u2VnaAae6TldXwnBjkVyjR8mw+eAjZB03snukvTQPImG5MlPsKk5XkM 8vag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JJs6iYZGcmy4f8P25BCaYSTDLU41psuC1UnFwj+Q/ISYpoGT7 jkkFLa5NxSPPuca6TXzuL3U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/Skxq73qcBTHUoTB+3qZ++3nCmOKCL8rjXTHUNRe8GG4KwlHVz/tolvjBL4Woxdwiti1M+w== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:88c5:: with SMTP id a5mr6804505ljk.250.1611778929542; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:22:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 04/22] xen/ioreq: Make x86's IOREQ feature common To: Julien Grall , Julien Grall Cc: xen-devel , Oleksandr Tyshchenko , Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= , Paul Durrant , Jun Nakajima , Kevin Tian , Tim Deegan , Julien Grall References: <1611601709-28361-1-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com> <1611601709-28361-5-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com> <20270711-36bc-6d7d-16cb-4572cace47ed@gmail.com> From: Oleksandr Message-ID: <1156e356-5762-a196-ec16-bb6614912394@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:22:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 27.01.21 20:43, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 25/01/2021 23:40, Oleksandr wrote: >> >> On 26.01.21 01:13, Julien Grall wrote: >>> Hi, >> >> Hi Julien > > Hi Oleksandr, Hi Julien > >> >>> >>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 19:09, Oleksandr Tyshchenko >>> wrote: >>>> *** >>>> Please note, this patch depends on the following which is >>>> on review: >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11816689/ >>>> The effort (to get it upstreamed) was paused because of >>>> the security issue around that code (XSA-348). >>>> *** >>> I read this comment as "This series should be applied on top the patch >>> X". However, looking at your branch, I can't see the patch. What did I >>> miss? >> You didn't miss anything. Patch series doesn't contain it. I >> mentioned about this patch in order not to forget about it >> and draw reviewer's attention. Looks like, the activity (to get it >> upstreamed) hasn't been resumed yet and I don't know what we should >> do with that dependency >> in the context of this series... > > I will reply what I wrote on IRC privately :). I think this fine to > defer it to after Xen 4.15 because IOREQ will be in tech preview. Thank you. I got a request to make a possibility for user to select IOREQ via the menuconfig on Arm. Saying tech preview do you mean that I also need to put it under CONFIG_EXPERT on Arm? > > Note that the bug can only be hit if the IOREQ server disappear behind > your back. AFAICT, this is mostly an issue with device model running > in non-trusted domain. I got it. -- Regards, Oleksandr Tyshchenko