From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030267AbXAYQOh (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:14:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030270AbXAYQOh (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:14:37 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:52242 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030267AbXAYQOh (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:14:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: Don't call bmdma_stop on non DMA capable controllers From: David Woodhouse To: Alan Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070125150905.652f9ce2@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070125150905.652f9ce2@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:14:18 +0800 Message-Id: <1169741658.3593.98.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-3.fc6.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:09 +0000, Alan wrote: > > diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c > --- linux.vanilla-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c 2007-01-22 16:26:50.000000000 +0000 > +++ linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c 2007-01-24 17:31:40.000000000 +0000 > @@ -827,7 +827,8 @@ > */ > void ata_bmdma_post_internal_cmd(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) > { > - ata_bmdma_stop(qc); > + if (qc->ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr) > + ata_bmdma_stop(qc); > } But what if the bmdma_addr _is_ zero? Please, let's not allow the "zero is not a valid number" braindamage to spread any further than the IRQ setup it's already broken. All the world is not a PeeCee. -- dwmw2