From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:46028 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965575AbXBFW3R (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:29:17 -0500 Received: from proski by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HEYnI-0004PV-1Y for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:28:08 -0500 Subject: Re: RFT bcm43xx: Really _GOOD_ news From: Pavel Roskin To: Gene Heskett Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, Larry Finger , wireless , Michael Buesch In-Reply-To: <200702061637.31756.gene.heskett@verizon.net> References: <45C8E64B.1050605@lwfinger.net> <200702061637.31756.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:29:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1170800953.2613.17.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 16:37 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > That's great Larry. Now how long does it take to get this into a > distro's > update kernel queue? Or do I have to build a kernel for my lappy, > currently on FC5? Gene, I think it would be better for all of us if we don't bother Larry with such questions and let him discover the secrets of the 802.11g rates :) I think that patch has a good chance to get into Fedora 7 from the beginning. We may see it in Fedora Core 6 if it goes to Linux 2.6.20 and this patch goes to the 2.6.20.x branch before that. I think the best we can do now would be to test the driver and report the results. This would speed up the process of getting the patch to the kernel. Yes, that means recompiling the kernel. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin