From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Expect defunct, kill -9 panics kernel? Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:35:44 -0600 Message-ID: <1171132545.3373.36.camel__696.42470120943$1416624283$gmane$org@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> References: <119aab440702100916q504101b1xe99f65ff5945e712@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: John David Anglin , parisc-linux To: "Carlos O'Donell" Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <119aab440702100916q504101b1xe99f65ff5945e712@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 12:16 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > At what point in the process life are we in __wake_up and > __wake_up_common? > An address of 0x10 is very suspicious. Almost every internal kernel event or semaphore uses these. Because of the empty backtrace, I'd be inclined to say it was the scheduler, possibly. 0x10 looks to be curr->func implying curr is NULL and thus the queue task_list is corrupt. That's the best I can do without the kernel to pull apart. James _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux