* [parisc-linux] Re: Another problem with making things static
[not found] <1171121364.3373.19.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
@ 2007-02-10 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20070210130130.2584e4d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-02-10 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Parisc List
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:29:24 -0600 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
> For any person who wants to make a static symbol exported, we force an
> explanation out of them about what they're trying to do and why. Might
> I suggest we apply the same standard to anyone trying to make something
> static? i.e. they need to explain clearly why the symbol shouldn't be
> part of any rational API.
>
The majority of these things are simply oversights: people forgot to
type `static'.
C got the defualt wrong..
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20070210130130.2584e4d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>]
* [parisc-linux] Re: Another problem with making things static
[not found] ` <20070210130130.2584e4d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
@ 2007-02-11 1:33 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2007-02-11 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Parisc List
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 13:01 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:29:24 -0600 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
>
> > For any person who wants to make a static symbol exported, we force an
> > explanation out of them about what they're trying to do and why. Might
> > I suggest we apply the same standard to anyone trying to make something
> > static? i.e. they need to explain clearly why the symbol shouldn't be
> > part of any rational API.
> >
>
> The majority of these things are simply oversights: people forgot to
> type `static'.
>
> C got the defualt wrong..
I agree ... lots of symbols in drivers or filesystems are obviously not
part of APIs ... however, that's not necessarily true of the kernel
proper. I think forcing someone to think about what they're doing and
justify going from non static to static or vice versa is a good idea in
those cases.
James
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-11 1:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1171121364.3373.19.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
2007-02-10 21:01 ` [parisc-linux] Re: Another problem with making things static Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20070210130130.2584e4d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-11 1:33 ` James Bottomley
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.