From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: LDAP automountMap or nisMap Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:37:14 +0900 Message-ID: <1171247834.18376.1.camel@raven.themaw.net> References: <10badf220702092315xa680710i211a575d4117297d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <10badf220702092315xa680710i211a575d4117297d@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org To: Shane Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 17:45 +1030, Shane wrote: > Hey All, > > I've been googling around trying to find out what is the "better" > option between using LDAP automountMap's or nisMap's. I can get either > / both working, the question is more for being able to find / get good > support should we need it, which of these maps is the preferred map to > use by autofs? ...does the answer change between autofs 3 and 4? There's more than one variant of the automountMap type. I believe the rfc2307bis is the most recent. Ian