From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] Add device tree for Ebony From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: David Gibson In-Reply-To: <20070214232246.GE16279@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070213060904.GA6214@localhost.localdomain> <20070213061026.5837FDDDE9@ozlabs.org> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302A1B705@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> <1171470754.4003.101.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <6206de08b7f12175bebe669291c66334@kernel.crashing.org> <20070214232246.GE16279@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:51:48 +1100 Message-Id: <1171497108.20192.202.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Yoder Stuart-B08248 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Yeah, I've been pretty usnsure about this myself. Using "soc" was > initially a hack to make the legacy serial detection stuff work, but I > think Arnd's of_platform serial stuff will deal with that better. > > On the other hand, using separate device_type has no particular value, > either. I wonder if we should have a general device_type for any > non-probeable, memory-mapped bus. What about dumb-bus ? :-0 Ben.