From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: spidernet (was Re: [PATCHSET] libata: PATA driver for Celleb) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:52:19 +1100 Message-ID: <1171525939.20192.245.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200701260724.l0Q7OISY027645@toshiba.co.jp> <45B9B1CD.4040600@garzik.org> <200702140518.l1E5IoWX010896@toshiba.co.jp> <1171430997.20192.136.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45D3EBB5.1090408@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:40537 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964928AbXBOHxB (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:53:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45D3EBB5.1090408@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: kou.ishizaki@toshiba.co.jp, Linas Vepstas , Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, arnd@arndb.de, paulus@samba.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Akira Iguchi On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:12 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > My overall impression of spidernet development is that EVERYBODY is submitting patches at once, and expecting me to sort out the mess. No thanks. > > > > Speaking with one voice would be much appreciated. And said speaker should patch the MAINTAINERS file to reflect reality. > > > To be specific, I have dropped -all- spidernet patches I had pending in > email, and at the present time there are no unsent spidernet commits in > netdev-2.6.git. > > I'll await the resend of any pending patches from the driver maintainer, > once you guys sort out who that is. That's the right approach. Agreed. Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57866DDD06 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:52:55 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: spidernet (was Re: [PATCHSET] libata: PATA driver for Celleb) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <45D3EBB5.1090408@garzik.org> References: <200701260724.l0Q7OISY027645@toshiba.co.jp> <45B9B1CD.4040600@garzik.org> <200702140518.l1E5IoWX010896@toshiba.co.jp> <1171430997.20192.136.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45D3EBB5.1090408@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:52:19 +1100 Message-Id: <1171525939.20192.245.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:12 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > My overall impression of spidernet development is that EVERYBODY is submitting patches at once, and expecting me to sort out the mess. No thanks. > > > > Speaking with one voice would be much appreciated. And said speaker should patch the MAINTAINERS file to reflect reality. > > > To be specific, I have dropped -all- spidernet patches I had pending in > email, and at the present time there are no unsent spidernet commits in > netdev-2.6.git. > > I'll await the resend of any pending patches from the driver maintainer, > once you guys sort out who that is. That's the right approach. Agreed. Ben.