All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Joseph Jezak <josejx@gentoo.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:19:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171552753.5220.10.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702151613.20746.mb@bu3sch.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 866 bytes --]

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 16:13 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Thursday 15 February 2007 16:07, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 22:40 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 14:18, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 06:55 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > It's likely that old cards still work with v4 firmware,
> > > > 
> > > > No, it's absolutely impossible. Rev 2/4 cores have a totally different
> > > > instruction set in the microcode.
> > > 
> > > Ok, I was not talking about _that_ old cards. ;)
> > 
> > Are there cards where they have new microcode instruction set but no v4
> > firmware?
> 
> I don't know. I guessed so. Am I wrong? That would be good :)

I wouldn't think so since we have rev5 v4 firmware and that should be
the oldest post-rev4 right?

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Joseph Jezak <josejx-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org>,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	John Linville <linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
	Larry Finger
	<larry.finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:19:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171552753.5220.10.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702151613.20746.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 866 bytes --]

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 16:13 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Thursday 15 February 2007 16:07, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 22:40 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 14:18, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 06:55 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > It's likely that old cards still work with v4 firmware,
> > > > 
> > > > No, it's absolutely impossible. Rev 2/4 cores have a totally different
> > > > instruction set in the microcode.
> > > 
> > > Ok, I was not talking about _that_ old cards. ;)
> > 
> > Are there cards where they have new microcode instruction set but no v4
> > firmware?
> 
> I don't know. I guessed so. Am I wrong? That would be good :)

I wouldn't think so since we have rev5 v4 firmware and that should be
the oldest post-rev4 right?

johannes

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 179 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-15 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-09 16:32 [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007 Larry Finger
2007-02-09 16:32 ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 17:11 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 17:11   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 18:11   ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 18:11     ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 22:22   ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 17:29     ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 18:21       ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 18:21         ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 18:48         ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:05         ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:17           ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:17             ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:55             ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 20:30               ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-14 12:52               ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 19:13                 ` Larry Finger
2007-02-14 19:26                   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 19:27                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 21:52                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-14 22:28                     ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 19:26           ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 19:26             ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 21:32             ` Matthew Garrett
2007-02-09 22:52               ` Martin Langer
2007-02-09 22:52                 ` Martin Langer
2007-02-10  5:55               ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-10  5:55                 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-10 12:57                 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-02-10 12:57                   ` Matthew Garrett
2007-02-27 17:00                   ` Gavin McCullagh
2007-02-27 17:00                     ` Gavin McCullagh
2007-02-11  2:13                 ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-14 13:18                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 13:18                   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 21:40                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 15:07                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-15 15:07                       ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-15 15:13                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 15:13                         ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 15:19                         ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2007-02-15 15:19                           ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-15 16:51                           ` Martin Langer
2007-02-15 16:51                             ` Martin Langer
2007-02-15 16:53                             ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-11 13:21               ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-11 13:21                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-09 18:45 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 18:45   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:17   ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:17     ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:26     ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:26       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:58       ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:58         ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 22:24 ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 22:24   ` Joseph Jezak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1171552753.5220.10.camel@johannes.berg \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=josejx@gentoo.org \
    --cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.