From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Lewis Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] libata: PATA driver for Celleb Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:03:06 -0600 Message-ID: <1171555386.3219.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200701260724.l0Q7OISY027645@toshiba.co.jp> <45D3EAA7.80805@garzik.org> <1171525923.20192.243.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200702151141.49708.jens@de.ibm.com> Reply-To: jim@jklewis.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200702151141.49708.jens@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Jens Osterkamp Cc: Jeff Garzik , arnd@arndb.de, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org We have had some discussions previously about Linas Vepstas taking over the maintainership of Spidernet from me. I will look into this and see if we can make it happen. Jim Lewis On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 11:41 +0100, Jens Osterkamp wrote: > On Thursday 15 February 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > I'm totally confused about who the heck is the spidernet maintainer. > > > > Me too :-) > > > > > My > > > inbox is pelted by spidernet driver updates from multiple people, and > > > often the spidernet patches (regardless of author) receive comments that > > > give me pause. The MAINTAINERS file says > > > > > > > SPIDERNET NETWORK DRIVER for CELL > > > > P: Jim Lewis > > > > M: jim@jklewis.com > > > > L: netdev@vger.kernel.org > > > > S: Supported > > > > > > but I do not see patch roll-ups or much activity from him at all. In > > > practice, it seems like Linas does patchsets for spidernet, but there is > > > also Jakob Osterkemp(sp?) and Ishizaki and.... > > > > I think Jens Osterkampf should be the final ACK/NAK'er as he has all the > > hardware to test except the Toshiba gear :-) In fact, Jens, if you are > > ok with that, I'd like to have you be the maintainer of that driver, > > unless you think it's better for Linas to do it. > > > > > My overall impression of spidernet development is that EVERYBODY is > > > submitting patches at once, and expecting me to sort out the mess. No > > > thanks. > > > > It's been a bit of a mess. I suggest we get our gear together (Linas, > > Jens, Kou) and provide you a single patch set from a single source in > > the upcoming couple of days coming from the designated maintainer. > > > > Jens ? Linas ? Is that ok with you guys ? Who gets to be that > > maintainer ? > > > > _ALSO_ since spidernet uses (and modifies) sungem_phy.c, we need either > > DaveM or my ack there (DaveM is sungem maintainer but I wrote sungem_phy > > and most of it is only used on powermacs). > > > > Thus let's move that back to the cbe-oss-dev mailing list, our > > designated maintainer will post there a candidate patch set, I will > > verify the sungem_phy change is ok with powermac (I myself haven't > > followed enough to figure out what patch is the latest there), we'll all > > test on our respective hardware, and then that maintainer will send you > > one patch set to apply. > > > > That shouldn't take more than a few days. If we miss -rc1, well, then it > > will be in -rc2, as most of the patches have been around for long enough > > etc... it's really mostly a matter of getting our gear together. > > > > > Speaking with one voice would be much appreciated. And said speaker > > > should patch the MAINTAINERS file to reflect reality. > > Sounds reasonable. I fully agree. > > Linas has done a pretty good job on improving the driver in the last half > year or so and he also has access to all the necessary hardware so I think > he would be the right person for the job. > > Jens