From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: fill nics features matrix for pcap Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:07:43 +0200 Message-ID: <11874060.SP5ECZ82Pk@xps13> References: <1460132630-857-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <1749775.pvWY8GPfrJ@xps13> <20160411095232.28cf6a58@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C2D1DB1 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:07:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a140so21456415wma.0 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:07:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160411095232.28cf6a58@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-04-11 09:52, Stephen Hemminger: > I wonder if this matrix would be better if auto-generated some how. > Either statically from source scan, or dynamically via simple app? It would be a good exercise. But I'm afraid the AI would be too complex to judge if the support is enough to be valid (e.g. link speed capabilities for sub-devices, support on architectures, content in the doc, etc).