From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Goran Subject: Re[2]: [dm-devel] [RFC] block: fix blk_queue_split() resource exhaustion Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:24:24 +0600 Message-ID: <1189799501.20160708192424@pvgoran.name> References: <1466583730-28595-1-git-send-email-lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> <871t36ggcr.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20160707081616.GH13335@soda.linbit> <87vb0hf6fb.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20160708080219.GT13335@soda.linbit> <877fcwfoyv.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20160708130035.GW13335@soda.linbit> Reply-To: Pavel Goran Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pvgoran2.xen.prgmr.com ([71.19.149.48]:59933 "EHLO v2.pvgoran.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754947AbcGHN3d (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:29:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160708130035.GW13335@soda.linbit> Sender: linux-bcache-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org To: Lars Ellenberg Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org Hello Lars, Friday, July 8, 2016, 7:00:35 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:39:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: >> I think we just might be in violent agreement. > I thought so, too :-) > Should I merge both patches, > rename to ".queue" and ".tmp", > and submit for inclusion? Could you please *not* use ".tmp"? I have a feeling it's even worse than "X" and "Y". :) I suggest to leave it as ".recursion", or maybe use something like ".downstream". Pavel Goran