Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adis16240: add of_match_table entry

["Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com>]

On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 10:50 -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> [External]
> 
> 
> Hi Alexandru,
> 
> On 05/24, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 6:30 AM Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > This patch adds of_match_table entry in device driver in order to
> > > enable spi fallback probing.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> > > index 8c6d23604eca..b80c8529784b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16240.c
> > > @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adis16240_of_match);
> > >  static struct spi_driver adis16240_driver = {
> > >         .driver = {
> > >                 .name = "adis16240",
> > > +               .of_match_table = adis16240_of_match,
> > 
> > This patch is missing the actual table.
> 
> Struct with compatible devices table was included separately in a
> previous patch at commit d9e533b6c0a26c7ef8116b7f3477c164c07bb6fb.
> Yeah, I also thought it was missing the match table the first time I was
> this patch. It's really confusing when we have two patches, one
> depending on another, that are not part of the same patch set. We're
> trying to avoid things like this the most but that slipped out from our
> internal review. We're sorry about that.

No worries.

It happens to me too.

Thanks
Alex

> 
> > 
> > >         },
> > >         .probe = adis16240_probe,
> > >         .remove = adis16240_remove,
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >