From: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:27:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11e9d3bb-c94c-4ad7-35b0-b698376c5e00@suse.de> (raw)
Hi Peter,
the "max" cpu in x86 and s390 is a class,
and then "host" has "max" as parent.
This would be a convenient setup for ARM too, as it would allow to put common code between kvm and tcg in the "max" class,
and allow "host" to specialize the behavior for KVM (and in the future HVF probably).
Would changing the class hierarchy this way be acceptable, cause any problems?
I ask specifically because on the x86 side I had to limit my changes to the hierarchy to adding objects,
but I would not change the relationship between them.
Thanks,
Claudio
--
Claudio Fontana
Engineering Manager Virtualization, SUSE Labs Core
SUSE Software Solutions Italy Srl
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 14:27 Claudio Fontana [this message]
2021-03-11 15:02 ` arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible? Peter Maydell
2021-03-11 15:21 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-11 16:02 ` Peter Maydell
2021-03-11 16:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-11 17:16 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-11 17:35 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-03-11 18:33 ` Peter Maydell
2021-03-11 19:10 ` Andrew Jones
2021-03-18 11:06 ` arm_cpu_post_init (Was: Re: arm: "max" CPU class hierarchy changes possible?) Claudio Fontana
2021-03-18 11:32 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-18 12:08 ` Andrew Jones
2021-03-18 12:42 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-18 12:59 ` Andrew Jones
2021-03-18 13:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-03-19 8:19 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-19 8:23 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-03-19 8:33 ` Claudio Fontana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11e9d3bb-c94c-4ad7-35b0-b698376c5e00@suse.de \
--to=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.