All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls/pselect: Add a zero latency	constraint
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:26:06 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217268944.70548669.1502450766723.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad947ee0-ee2a-840a-b9ac-74170d0ec7f3@linaro.org>



----- Original Message -----
> On 10/08/2017 13:50, Jiri Jaburek wrote:
> > On 08/10/17 10:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> The pselect_01 testcase works well on an x86 as it is a fast platform,
> >> with
> >> fast exit latency idle routine.
> >>
> >> However on ARM[64] the idle routine can take much more time, for example
> >> 1500us.
> >>
> >> The pselect fails on the ARM[64] platforms because of these slow exit
> >> latencies,
> >> the delay between the expected expiration and the observed one is not
> >> acceptable.
> >>
> >> The fix could be to increase the deviation on ARM64 but that wouldn't make
> >> sense as some platforms, for the same architecture, can have faster or
> >> different delays, hence we can potentially miss a bug.
> >>
> >> The simplest solution is to set the cpu_dma latency constraint to zero, so
> >> the
> >> idle driver will always choose the fastest idle state, thus fixing the
> >> issue
> >> above. The latency constraint will apply only for this test.
> > 
> > I think a more generic LTP-wide solution could be made; there are more
> > tests that fail ie. on virtualized environments because of CPU over-
> > provisioning on the host (x86, s390, ppc, etc.)
> 
> Not sure a latency constraint will fix the above.

We could detect bare-metal / (some [1]) virt and adjust threshold
for timer tests, but I'm assuming Daniel sees this on bare metal,
so this patch would be useful anyway.

[1] kvm/xen is easy to detect, lpars might be more tricky

Regards,
Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-11 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-10  8:01 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] ltp: Add the ability to specify the latency constraint Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-10  8:01 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls/pselect: Add a zero " Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-10 11:50   ` Jiri Jaburek
2017-08-10 12:00     ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-11 11:26       ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2017-08-11 11:25 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] ltp: Add the ability to specify the " Jan Stancek
2017-08-11 12:54   ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 " Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-11 12:54     ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 2/2] syscalls/pselect: Add a zero " Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-11 14:09     ` [LTP] [PATCH V2 1/2] ltp: Add the ability to specify the " Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-11 14:52       ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-11 15:28         ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-14 12:56           ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-14 13:33             ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-14 14:19               ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-14 14:36                 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-14 15:43                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-15 11:06                     ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-15 20:15                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-17 13:50                         ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-08-17 14:02                           ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-17 15:00                           ` [LTP] [PATCH V3] ltp: Add a zero latency constraint for the timer tests library Daniel Lezcano
2017-08-18 12:25                             ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-12-12 14:48                               ` Jan Stancek
2017-12-12 14:56                                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-12-12 15:04                                   ` Jan Stancek
2017-12-12 15:21                                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-12-13 17:00                                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-12-13 20:42                                         ` Jan Stancek
2018-02-01 22:52                                       ` Jan Stancek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1217268944.70548669.1502450766723.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.