All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock_set_subclass - reset a held lock's subclass
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:49:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217623796.9016.8.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <489350AE.1030609@goop.org>

On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:06 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Subject: lockdep: lock_set_subclass - reset a held lock's subclass
> >
> > this can be used to reset a held lock's subclass, for arbitrary-depth
> > iterated data structures such as trees or lists which have per-node
> > locks.
> >   
> 
> Hey, can I use this to suppress the spurious lockdep warnings I get when 
> I try to hold more than one pte lock at once?

No, you still cannot hold more than 48 locks at any one time, and this
somewhat horrible annotation only works if you don't generate double
classes in the same chain.

What it can do is:

  L1
   L2
    U1
     L3
      U2
       etc..

What you do is:

  spin_lock(L1)
   spin_lock_nested(L2, 1)
    spin_unlock(L1);
    lockdep_set_subclass(L2, 0); // because L1, who was 0 isn't there anymore
     spin_lock_nested(L3, 1);
      spin_unlock(L2);
      lockdep_set_subclass(L2, 0); // blah blah..
       etc...




  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-01 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-31 21:43 [git pull] scheduler fixes Ingo Molnar
2008-07-31 22:04 ` David Miller
2008-07-31 22:26   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-31 22:55     ` David Miller
2008-08-01  8:11       ` David Miller
2008-08-01  9:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-01  9:13           ` David Miller
2008-08-01 11:08             ` [PATCH] lockdep: lock_set_subclass - reset a held lock's subclass Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-01 18:06               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-01 18:14                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-01 19:10                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-01 19:24                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-01 20:08                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-01 19:59                     ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-01 20:22                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-01 20:33                         ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-01 23:20                       ` David Miller
2008-08-01 23:26                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-01 20:49                 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-08-01 11:08             ` [PATCH] lockdep: re-annotate scheduler runqueues Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-01 17:04               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-02  8:34               ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1217623796.9016.8.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.