From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: moon.linux@yahoo.com (Anand Moon) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung In-Reply-To: References: <20150127024846.GB3124@kroah.com> <10984.1422331319@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <12694.1422333909@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Message-ID: <1218844080.996910.1422342028538.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org Hi Giridhara, http://ark.intel.com/products/64622/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4650-20M-Cache-2_70-GHz-8_00-GTs-Intel-QPI Show it has only 8 core of CPU. Why are you setting the CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64. certainly it will have a issue in the kernel. -Anand Moon On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:27 AM, Giridhara RP (grp) wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:15 AM To: Giridhara RP (grp) Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:06:00 +0000, "Giridhara RP (grp)" said: > Which kernel version should I use to solve this crash/panic? That will depend on exactly why you're still running a 2.6.32 kernel from 6 years ago. Remember - the fact it's all the way up to 2.6.32.65 doesn't mean you have all the bugfixes. It only means you have all the bugfixes that qualified for the -stable side of the fence (which is a small fraction of all the fixes that have happened in the past 6 years). ----------------------- Hi Valdis, We were running 2.6.32.60 assuming it's a stable build and my assumption was wrong :(. Should I go ahead with stable 3.18.3 [2015-01-16 ]. Thanks Giri _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies