From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D46E3DDE1F for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:52:11 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Device Tree From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Chr=E9tien?= In-Reply-To: <48E07490.9020805@enseirb.fr> References: <48E07490.9020805@enseirb.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:51:52 +1000 Message-Id: <1222678312.7807.95.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:24 +0200, Sébastien Chrétien wrote: > Hello, > I have a question about Device Tree. > Is Device Tree found only only on Linux Powerpc ? Sparc also uses open firmware and shares some of the device-tree handling code with powerpc in linux. Other operating systems on those platforms also use it (AIX, Solaris, MacOS, ...) I think the proposed new Xilinx microblaze architecture also uses it, and at least on x86, the OLPC has an Open Firmware implementation though it doesn't use the device-tree the way we do currently on powerpc and sparc and has its own interface to the firmware. Ben.