From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:49617 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752555AbYLMALC (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:11:02 -0500 Subject: Re: Userspace tools: Roadmap? From: Johannes Berg To: pat-lkml Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <4942FD59.8020401@erley.org> References: <1228692546.8826.1288759933@webmail.messagingengine.com> (sfid-20081208_002919_244971_30E436F9) <1228723993.22164.65.camel@johannes.berg> <1228778295.10662.1288975589@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1228778801.22164.156.camel@johannes.berg> <493DB351.6000103@erley.org> <1228780960.22164.162.camel@johannes.berg> <4941EF69.5040108@erley.org> <1229099080.14423.15.camel@dv> <1229119118.3572.6.camel@johannes.berg> <4942E7A4.3050206@erley.org> <1229121535.3565.4.camel@johannes.berg> <4942F867.5020203@erley.org> <1229126725.3565.30.camel@johannes.berg> <4942FD59.8020401@erley.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eWOSQs1dUtjbU65is66O" Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:10:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1229127057.3565.34.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20081213_011107_606531_13BB063A) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-eWOSQs1dUtjbU65is66O Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:10 -0500, pat-lkml wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:48 -0500, pat-lkml wrote: > >> This converts iw to use libnl-2, and adds compatibility with libnl-1. > >> There is not currently a good way to detect the libnl version during > >> compilation, as the versioning in the netlink/version.h is defined as > >> a > >> string "2.0" rather than a major and a minor number, so we must detect > >> it in the Makefile. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pat Erley > >=20 > > Ok, I've committed a slightly different version of this (corrected the > > type, and made the compat code static inlines), can you verify it still > > works against 2.0? > Yep, works fine with 2.0 Alright, thanks for the patch and testing! johannes --=-eWOSQs1dUtjbU65is66O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJJQv2NAAoJEKVg1VMiehFYka4QAIGRE+D3YVo/OXZC8Kt8BQIN tYYUnhvPVF1OOYC/7HX3Vmhknl3tcXx1Bv2NfX59sjtm/4PFXEy5IWTlwMVTcn7A F4avSP10EF833W5I+2WGiG4z1UupQViQeCLcThaS6vNyA6xomW7kvtYWMyFh/Ys3 5YG7qJY24YdV711V9P2XAM8VuDBIs2hH6Z7DgsUk9S87E1n2MvGIKNiZ0RD9Q1wp CVZ2sRcRuht2GAtTwh4y+OdKKrZFhZ0cdc5nsxH4jdBXA1hUu8WOntMu9gWRitBX bw5jZF2em35B7qxYpR9hRNLota2Xc5LCPP1JKvP5cTvt0RWwghgb5i1+G49sINLT SWFF7/YsvLrpYbMwMMBlmfW0pQN7wTqDI9O9EJBi84MtOVCEKpGcS93vkcFxr+5K r9H/iEkYDH06PDTa0QweVMW/vYVwyKREc0tzMx9bGI+Dsje8vQnFHGOv1ulN6C3S TN1bBRFe9AeCaK9WBiw9nFAJDK3XvcZJMyrGrY4BJzNtWqqKf4Arc+6DlSbbP40f t8CoH234T85zy9+SNaQQf6oUod7sRNCW85Kcrc5bersMZQcCe8KLkAlNYOqukwRs HTAtwPla9sWRKPETzDegzqqO1c8CobWC0Z00sqTbFiEwStq/7sKFCAQSpuqKB+ae nxLt0g5ShJFsjQsaHWwl =7Vnd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eWOSQs1dUtjbU65is66O--