From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754680AbZCDHMu (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:12:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751427AbZCDHMj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:12:39 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49614 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750827AbZCDHMi (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:12:38 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/BjdQHXnnBmVHDl5txSHci575B38nckw7DwFo7EV MxohS4VFckFqHS Subject: Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects From: Mike Galbraith To: Stefan Richter Cc: Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , Jan Engelhardt , Boaz Harrosh , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <49AE221D.9010909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> References: <49ACF8FE.2020904@panasas.com> <1236093718.3263.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1236097526.3263.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303192212.GA20705@elte.hu> <1236115544.15993.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303214454.GA8288@elte.hu> <1236119990.24019.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303230323.GA21644@elte.hu> <49ADBE29.4040706@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090303234834.GA13389@elte.hu> <49AE221D.9010909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:12:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1236150752.6049.19.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:39 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stefan Richter wrote: > >> Perhaps you could avoid putting such fixes into published > >> merge branches. > [so that consumers of the trees use them only on demand] > > > > Yeah, these commits are in none of the topic branches that are > > the git base of development, they are all already in a separate > > branch named "tip:out-of-tree". > > So people should remember to retry without out-of-tree before reporting > problems == remember to report against the development base. I'll bite, how does a gut-fu white belt accomplish that? -Mike