From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Morten K. Poulsen" Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:43:48 +0000 Subject: Re: Web based moderation system for MLMMJ Message-Id: <1236357828.6389.85.camel@mopo-laptop> List-Id: References: <498C406B.9070200@goirand.fr> In-Reply-To: <498C406B.9070200@goirand.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Hi Thomas, On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:38 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Outch! I normally work with error reporting E_ALL, my bad... > > By the way, I did it right away, because otherwise I will forget. That one was for me, right? ;-) > I didn't even think a mail could ever be sent with no From:, Date: or > such header. How nasty can it be that a mail server is accepting such > email? :( I am not sure that it will ever happen in real life, but I had the path set to the listdir (not listdir/moderation) by error, so that's why it barfed. > Attached is a diff to apply. Thanks, I have committed it to CVS. > It seems you missed my README, can you re-add it in the folder? I don't think it was the tarball, so I have copied the text from the mail body of your original mail into a README file, and committed it to CVS. Please check it to see if is what you wanted. The updated version is available here: http://mlmmj.mmj.dk/~mortenp/mlmmj-php-moderation-cvs20090306.tar.bz2 > Also, why the .htaccess in the translation folder has been renamed to > dot.htaccess? Is that because you are using CVS? No, it's because I don't like to have "hidden" files in the distribution. It's an old BOFH habit. > To me, it would be wise to switch to Git. You would never regret > it!!! Git is just the RCS flavor of the month. I don't see any compelling arguments in favor of switching. Subversion might be an alternative to CVS, but what do we gain by switching away from a tried and tested revision control system which does a perfect job of keeping track of the source code? //mopo -- Morten K. Poulsen CTO, FableTech http://fabletech.com/