From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261239AbTJJLzv (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 07:55:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261528AbTJJLzv (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 07:55:51 -0400 Received: from frontend-1.hamburg.de ([212.1.41.126]:15758 "EHLO ebbe.int-rz.hamburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261239AbTJJLzu (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 07:55:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1239031.1065786947952.JavaMail.nobody@franzjosef> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Illegal-Object: Syntax error in From: address found on vger.kernel.org: From: "Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20N=FCtzel=22?= " ^-missing closing '"' in token From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nikita@Namesys.COM Subject: Re: Re: File System shootout... Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikeb@netnation.com, Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: SNetLine WebMail by Schliepi X-Priority: 3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Mike Benoit writes: > > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks > > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems > > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More > > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they > > come in. > > > > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the > > different file systems strengths and weaknesses. > > > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/ > > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results > for reiser4 vs. ext3: > > on the box with 128M of ram: Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3? Greetings, Dieter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dieter =?unknown-8bit?q?N=FCtzel?= Subject: Re: Re: File System shootout... Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1239031.1065786947952.JavaMail.nobody@franzjosef> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Nikita@Namesys.COM Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikeb@netnation.com, Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM > Mike Benoit writes: > > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks > > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems > > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More > > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they > > come in. > > > > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the > > different file systems strengths and weaknesses. > > > > http://fsbench.netnation.com/ > > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results > for reiser4 vs. ext3: > > on the box with 128M of ram: Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3? Greetings, Dieter