From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc2 soft lockups: ACPI? clock source problem? Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:24:39 -0700 Message-ID: <1240514679.10627.168.camel@nimitz> References: <1240335038.11194.11.camel@nimitz> <20090422204557.10c3cc37.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1240511508.10627.159.camel@nimitz> <1240513827.7224.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:33411 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759103AbZDWTYl (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:24:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1240513827.7224.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: john stultz Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , linux-acpi , lenb@kernel.org On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 12:10 -0700, john stultz wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:31 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 20:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > (Is jstultz@us.ibm.com correct?) > > > > Only I want it to go to the black hole which is Lotus Notes. :) > > > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:30:38 -0700 Dave Hansen wrote: > > > > This was during my first boot of 2.6.30-rc2. > > > > > > Did it ever happen again? > > > > I've seen it on three different boots, but the stack traces were a bit > > different each time. So, I assume it is a true timekeeping thing > > instead of something *actually* locking up. > > > > > I assume this is a post-2.6.29 regression? (Yet another. We've been > > > extra bad this time) > > > > This laptop has been quite good to me and I haven't rebooted since the > > late 2.6.28 days. It isn't anything special, though. Just a Lenovo > > T61. I wonder if my .config is a bit different. > > I've got a T61 at home, so I'll try to test it out. Dave, can you send > me your .config? Also any chance you can bisect this down a tiny bit? http://sr71.net/~dave/linux/config-forjohn-04-23-2009 I'll work on bisecting it down in a bit. -- Dave