From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.44]:36964 "EHLO
	mail-in-04.arcor-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753942AbZEJAxI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 9 May 2009 20:53:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FM1216ME_MK3 some changes
From: hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de>
To: Andy Walls <awalls@radix.net>
Cc: Dmitri Belimov <d.belimov@gmail.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	video4linux-list@redhat.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1241836025.3717.9.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
References: <20090422174848.1be88f61@glory.loctelecom.ru>
	 <1240452534.3232.70.camel@palomino.walls.org>
	 <20090423203618.4ac2bc6f@glory.loctelecom.ru>
	 <1240537394.3231.37.camel@palomino.walls.org>
	 <20090427192905.3ad2b88c@glory.loctelecom.ru>
	 <20090428151832.241fa9b4@pedra.chehab.org>
	 <20090428195922.1a079e46@glory.loctelecom.ru>
	 <1240974643.4280.24.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
	 <20090429201225.6ba681cf@glory.loctelecom.ru>
	 <1241050556.3710.109.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
	 <20090506044231.31f2d8aa@glory.loctelecom.ru>
	 <1241654513.5862.37.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
	 <1241665384.3147.53.camel@palomino.walls.org>
	 <1241741304.4864.29.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
	 <1241834493.3482.140.camel@palomino.walls.org>
	 <1241836025.3717.9.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 02:43:05 +0200
Message-Id: <1241916185.3694.8.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

[snip]
> > 
> > Channel designations I dug out of ivtv-tune:
> > 
> > S38 439.250 MHz (European cable)
> > H18 439.250 MHz (SECAM France)
> > 47  440.250 MHz (PAL China)
> > 059 440.250 MHz (PAL Argentina)
> > 
> > come close, but are unaffected by the change from 442 to 441 as the
> > bandswitch cutover point.  These channels fall right on top of the
> > cutover, but are not affected by the proposed change in any meaningful
> > way.  The VHF-High filter and VCO would still be used.  Dmitri's
> > proposed change is a "don't care" unless the cutover point is changed to
> > 440 MHz. 
> > 
> > 
> > Let's pretend that the proposed cutover point is 440 MHz.

NO! it is not

Dmitri,

can you cut one off and tell us what it is all about ?

Unless you do so, all other is pointless and I likely stop to
participate in such stuff.

Cheers,
Hermann