All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: chris.mason@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jack@suse.cz,
	yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] writeback: move dirty inodes from super_block to backing_dev_info
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:30:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243236668-3398-7-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243236668-3398-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>

This is a first step at introducing per-bdi flusher threads. We should
have no change in behaviour, although sb_has_dirty_inodes() is now
ridiculously expensive, as there's no easy way to answer that question.
Not a huge problem, since it'll be deleted in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c           |  196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 fs/super.c                  |    3 -
 include/linux/backing-dev.h |    9 ++
 include/linux/fs.h          |    5 +-
 mm/backing-dev.c            |   30 +++++++
 mm/page-writeback.c         |   11 +--
 6 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 91013ff..1137408 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
 #include "internal.h"
 
+#define inode_to_bdi(inode)	((inode)->i_mapping->backing_dev_info)
 
 /**
  * writeback_acquire - attempt to get exclusive writeback access to a device
@@ -158,12 +159,13 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
 			goto out;
 
 		/*
-		 * If the inode was already on s_dirty/s_io/s_more_io, don't
-		 * reposition it (that would break s_dirty time-ordering).
+		 * If the inode was already on b_dirty/b_io/b_more_io, don't
+		 * reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering).
 		 */
 		if (!was_dirty) {
 			inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
-			list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
+			list_move(&inode->i_list,
+					&inode_to_bdi(inode)->b_dirty);
 		}
 	}
 out:
@@ -184,31 +186,30 @@ static int write_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
  * furthest end of its superblock's dirty-inode list.
  *
  * Before stamping the inode's ->dirtied_when, we check to see whether it is
- * already the most-recently-dirtied inode on the s_dirty list.  If that is
+ * already the most-recently-dirtied inode on the b_dirty list.  If that is
  * the case then the inode must have been redirtied while it was being written
  * out and we don't reset its dirtied_when.
  */
 static void redirty_tail(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
+	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
 
-	if (!list_empty(&sb->s_dirty)) {
-		struct inode *tail_inode;
+	if (!list_empty(&bdi->b_dirty)) {
+		struct inode *tail;
 
-		tail_inode = list_entry(sb->s_dirty.next, struct inode, i_list);
-		if (time_before(inode->dirtied_when,
-				tail_inode->dirtied_when))
+		tail = list_entry(bdi->b_dirty.next, struct inode, i_list);
+		if (time_before(inode->dirtied_when, tail->dirtied_when))
 			inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
 	}
-	list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
+	list_move(&inode->i_list, &bdi->b_dirty);
 }
 
 /*
- * requeue inode for re-scanning after sb->s_io list is exhausted.
+ * requeue inode for re-scanning after bdi->b_io list is exhausted.
  */
 static void requeue_io(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode->i_sb->s_more_io);
+	list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_to_bdi(inode)->b_more_io);
 }
 
 static void inode_sync_complete(struct inode *inode)
@@ -255,18 +256,50 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct list_head *delaying_queue,
 /*
  * Queue all expired dirty inodes for io, eldest first.
  */
-static void queue_io(struct super_block *sb,
-				unsigned long *older_than_this)
+static void queue_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+		     unsigned long *older_than_this)
+{
+	list_splice_init(&bdi->b_more_io, bdi->b_io.prev);
+	move_expired_inodes(&bdi->b_dirty, &bdi->b_io, older_than_this);
+}
+
+static int sb_on_inode_list(struct super_block *sb, struct list_head *list)
 {
-	list_splice_init(&sb->s_more_io, sb->s_io.prev);
-	move_expired_inodes(&sb->s_dirty, &sb->s_io, older_than_this);
+	struct inode *inode;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	spin_lock(&inode_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(inode, list, i_list) {
+		if (inode->i_sb == sb) {
+			ret = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int sb_has_dirty_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-	return !list_empty(&sb->s_dirty) ||
-	       !list_empty(&sb->s_io) ||
-	       !list_empty(&sb->s_more_io);
+	struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * This is REALLY expensive right now, but it'll go away
+	 * when the bdi writeback is introduced
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list) {
+		if (sb_on_inode_list(sb, &bdi->b_dirty) ||
+		    sb_on_inode_list(sb, &bdi->b_io) ||
+		    sb_on_inode_list(sb, &bdi->b_more_io)) {
+			ret = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_has_dirty_inodes);
 
@@ -322,11 +355,11 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 			/*
 			 * We didn't write back all the pages.  nfs_writepages()
 			 * sometimes bales out without doing anything. Redirty
-			 * the inode; Move it from s_io onto s_more_io/s_dirty.
+			 * the inode; Move it from b_io onto b_more_io/b_dirty.
 			 */
 			/*
 			 * akpm: if the caller was the kupdate function we put
-			 * this inode at the head of s_dirty so it gets first
+			 * this inode at the head of b_dirty so it gets first
 			 * consideration.  Otherwise, move it to the tail, for
 			 * the reasons described there.  I'm not really sure
 			 * how much sense this makes.  Presumably I had a good
@@ -336,7 +369,7 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 			if (wbc->for_kupdate) {
 				/*
 				 * For the kupdate function we move the inode
-				 * to s_more_io so it will get more writeout as
+				 * to b_more_io so it will get more writeout as
 				 * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
 				 */
 				inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
@@ -402,10 +435,10 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 	if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_SYNC)) {
 		/*
 		 * We're skipping this inode because it's locked, and we're not
-		 * doing writeback-for-data-integrity.  Move it to s_more_io so
-		 * that writeback can proceed with the other inodes on s_io.
+		 * doing writeback-for-data-integrity.  Move it to b_more_io so
+		 * that writeback can proceed with the other inodes on b_io.
 		 * We'll have another go at writing back this inode when we
-		 * completed a full scan of s_io.
+		 * completed a full scan of b_io.
 		 */
 		requeue_io(inode);
 		return 0;
@@ -428,51 +461,34 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 	return __sync_single_inode(inode, wbc);
 }
 
-/*
- * Write out a superblock's list of dirty inodes.  A wait will be performed
- * upon no inodes, all inodes or the final one, depending upon sync_mode.
- *
- * If older_than_this is non-NULL, then only write out inodes which
- * had their first dirtying at a time earlier than *older_than_this.
- *
- * If we're a pdflush thread, then implement pdflush collision avoidance
- * against the entire list.
- *
- * If `bdi' is non-zero then we're being asked to writeback a specific queue.
- * This function assumes that the blockdev superblock's inodes are backed by
- * a variety of queues, so all inodes are searched.  For other superblocks,
- * assume that all inodes are backed by the same queue.
- *
- * FIXME: this linear search could get expensive with many fileystems.  But
- * how to fix?  We need to go from an address_space to all inodes which share
- * a queue with that address_space.  (Easy: have a global "dirty superblocks"
- * list).
- *
- * The inodes to be written are parked on sb->s_io.  They are moved back onto
- * sb->s_dirty as they are selected for writing.  This way, none can be missed
- * on the writer throttling path, and we get decent balancing between many
- * throttled threads: we don't want them all piling up on inode_sync_wait.
- */
-void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
-				struct writeback_control *wbc)
+static void generic_sync_bdi_inodes(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
+				    struct writeback_control *wbc,
+				    struct super_block *sb,
+				    int is_blkdev_sb)
 {
 	const unsigned long start = jiffies;	/* livelock avoidance */
-	int sync = wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL;
 
 	spin_lock(&inode_lock);
-	if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&sb->s_io))
-		queue_io(sb, wbc->older_than_this);
 
-	while (!list_empty(&sb->s_io)) {
-		struct inode *inode = list_entry(sb->s_io.prev,
+	if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&bdi->b_io))
+		queue_io(bdi, wbc->older_than_this);
+
+	while (!list_empty(&bdi->b_io)) {
+		struct inode *inode = list_entry(bdi->b_io.prev,
 						struct inode, i_list);
-		struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
-		struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
 		long pages_skipped;
 
+		/*
+		 * super block given and doesn't match, skip this inode
+		 */
+		if (sb && sb != inode->i_sb) {
+			redirty_tail(inode);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (!bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi)) {
 			redirty_tail(inode);
-			if (sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb)) {
+			if (is_blkdev_sb) {
 				/*
 				 * Dirty memory-backed blockdev: the ramdisk
 				 * driver does this.  Skip just this inode
@@ -494,14 +510,14 @@ void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
 
 		if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
 			wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
-			if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb))
+			if (!is_blkdev_sb)
 				break;		/* Skip a congested fs */
 			requeue_io(inode);
 			continue;		/* Skip a congested blockdev */
 		}
 
 		if (wbc->bdi && bdi != wbc->bdi) {
-			if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb))
+			if (!is_blkdev_sb)
 				break;		/* fs has the wrong queue */
 			requeue_io(inode);
 			continue;		/* blockdev has wrong queue */
@@ -539,13 +555,55 @@ void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
 			wbc->more_io = 1;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
+		if (!list_empty(&bdi->b_more_io))
 			wbc->more_io = 1;
 	}
 
-	if (sync) {
+	spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+	/* Leave any unwritten inodes on b_io */
+}
+
+/*
+ * Write out a superblock's list of dirty inodes.  A wait will be performed
+ * upon no inodes, all inodes or the final one, depending upon sync_mode.
+ *
+ * If older_than_this is non-NULL, then only write out inodes which
+ * had their first dirtying at a time earlier than *older_than_this.
+ *
+ * If we're a pdlfush thread, then implement pdflush collision avoidance
+ * against the entire list.
+ *
+ * If `bdi' is non-zero then we're being asked to writeback a specific queue.
+ * This function assumes that the blockdev superblock's inodes are backed by
+ * a variety of queues, so all inodes are searched.  For other superblocks,
+ * assume that all inodes are backed by the same queue.
+ *
+ * FIXME: this linear search could get expensive with many fileystems.  But
+ * how to fix?  We need to go from an address_space to all inodes which share
+ * a queue with that address_space.  (Easy: have a global "dirty superblocks"
+ * list).
+ *
+ * The inodes to be written are parked on bdi->b_io.  They are moved back onto
+ * bdi->b_dirty as they are selected for writing.  This way, none can be missed
+ * on the writer throttling path, and we get decent balancing between many
+ * throttled threads: we don't want them all piling up on inode_sync_wait.
+ */
+void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
+				struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+	const int is_blkdev_sb = sb_is_blkdev_sb(sb);
+	struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
+
+	mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list)
+		generic_sync_bdi_inodes(bdi, wbc, sb, is_blkdev_sb);
+	mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
+
+	if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) {
 		struct inode *inode, *old_inode = NULL;
 
+		spin_lock(&inode_lock);
+
 		/*
 		 * Data integrity sync. Must wait for all pages under writeback,
 		 * because there may have been pages dirtied before our sync
@@ -583,10 +641,8 @@ void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
 		iput(old_inode);
-	} else
-		spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+	}
 
-	return;		/* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_sync_sb_inodes);
 
@@ -601,8 +657,8 @@ static void sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
  *
  * Note:
  * We don't need to grab a reference to superblock here. If it has non-empty
- * ->s_dirty it's hadn't been killed yet and kill_super() won't proceed
- * past sync_inodes_sb() until the ->s_dirty/s_io/s_more_io lists are all
+ * ->b_dirty it's hadn't been killed yet and kill_super() won't proceed
+ * past sync_inodes_sb() until the ->b_dirty/b_io/b_more_io lists are all
  * empty. Since __sync_single_inode() regains inode_lock before it finally moves
  * inode from superblock lists we are OK.
  *
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 1943fdf..76dd5b2 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -64,9 +64,6 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type)
 			s = NULL;
 			goto out;
 		}
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_dirty);
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_io);
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_more_io);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_files);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&s->s_instances);
 		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&s->s_anon);
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
index 0ec2c59..8719c87 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ enum bdi_stat_item {
 #define BDI_STAT_BATCH (8*(1+ilog2(nr_cpu_ids)))
 
 struct backing_dev_info {
+	struct list_head bdi_list;
+
 	unsigned long ra_pages;	/* max readahead in PAGE_CACHE_SIZE units */
 	unsigned long state;	/* Always use atomic bitops on this */
 	unsigned int capabilities; /* Device capabilities */
@@ -58,6 +60,10 @@ struct backing_dev_info {
 
 	struct device *dev;
 
+	struct list_head	b_dirty;	/* dirty inodes */
+	struct list_head	b_io;		/* parked for writeback */
+	struct list_head	b_more_io;	/* parked for more writeback */
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 	struct dentry *debug_dir;
 	struct dentry *debug_stats;
@@ -72,6 +78,9 @@ int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent,
 int bdi_register_dev(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, dev_t dev);
 void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
 
+extern struct mutex bdi_lock;
+extern struct list_head bdi_list;
+
 static inline void __add_bdi_stat(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
 		enum bdi_stat_item item, s64 amount)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 3b534e5..6b475d4 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static inline int mapping_writably_mapped(struct address_space *mapping)
 
 struct inode {
 	struct hlist_node	i_hash;
-	struct list_head	i_list;
+	struct list_head	i_list;		/* backing dev IO list */
 	struct list_head	i_sb_list;
 	struct list_head	i_dentry;
 	unsigned long		i_ino;
@@ -1329,9 +1329,6 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct xattr_handler	**s_xattr;
 
 	struct list_head	s_inodes;	/* all inodes */
-	struct list_head	s_dirty;	/* dirty inodes */
-	struct list_head	s_io;		/* parked for writeback */
-	struct list_head	s_more_io;	/* parked for more writeback */
 	struct hlist_head	s_anon;		/* anonymous dentries for (nfs) exporting */
 	struct list_head	s_files;
 	/* s_dentry_lru and s_nr_dentry_unused are protected by dcache_lock */
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 493b468..186fdce 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ struct backing_dev_info default_backing_dev_info = {
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(default_backing_dev_info);
 
 static struct class *bdi_class;
+DEFINE_MUTEX(bdi_lock);
+LIST_HEAD(bdi_list);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
@@ -211,6 +213,10 @@ int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent,
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
+	list_add_tail_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list, &bdi_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
+
 	bdi->dev = dev;
 	bdi_debug_register(bdi, dev_name(dev));
 
@@ -225,9 +231,23 @@ int bdi_register_dev(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, dev_t dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_register_dev);
 
+static void bdi_remove_from_list(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
+	list_del_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * In case the bdi is freed right after unregister, we need to
+	 * make sure any RCU sections have exited
+	 */
+	synchronize_rcu();
+}
+
 void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
 	if (bdi->dev) {
+		bdi_remove_from_list(bdi);
 		bdi_debug_unregister(bdi);
 		device_unregister(bdi->dev);
 		bdi->dev = NULL;
@@ -245,6 +265,10 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 	bdi->min_ratio = 0;
 	bdi->max_ratio = 100;
 	bdi->max_prop_frac = PROP_FRAC_BASE;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->bdi_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->b_io);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->b_dirty);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->b_more_io);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_BDI_STAT_ITEMS; i++) {
 		err = percpu_counter_init(&bdi->bdi_stat[i], 0);
@@ -259,6 +283,8 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 err:
 		while (i--)
 			percpu_counter_destroy(&bdi->bdi_stat[i]);
+
+		bdi_remove_from_list(bdi);
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -269,6 +295,10 @@ void bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&bdi->b_dirty));
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&bdi->b_io));
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&bdi->b_more_io));
+
 	bdi_unregister(bdi);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_BDI_STAT_ITEMS; i++)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index bb553c3..7c44314 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -319,15 +319,13 @@ static void task_dirty_limit(struct task_struct *tsk, long *pdirty)
 /*
  *
  */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bdi_lock);
 static unsigned int bdi_min_ratio;
 
 int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&bdi_lock, flags);
+	mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
 	if (min_ratio > bdi->max_ratio) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	} else {
@@ -339,27 +337,26 @@ int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio)
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bdi_lock, flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
 
 int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned max_ratio)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (max_ratio > 100)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&bdi_lock, flags);
+	mutex_lock(&bdi_lock);
 	if (bdi->min_ratio > max_ratio) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	} else {
 		bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
 		bdi->max_prop_frac = (PROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bdi_lock, flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&bdi_lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.6.3.rc0.1.gf800


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-25  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-25  7:30 [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads #5 Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 01/13] libata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple() Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 01/12] ntfs: remove old debug check for dirty data in ntfs_put_super() Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 02/13] block: add static rq allocation cache Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 02/12] btrfs: properly register fs backing device Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 03/13] scsi: unify allocation of scsi command and sense buffer Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-25  7:46     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-25  7:54         ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-25 10:33         ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-25 10:42           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-25 10:49             ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  4:36         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-26  5:08           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-25  8:15   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-25  8:15     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-05-25 11:32     ` Nick Piggin
2009-05-25  9:28   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-26  1:45     ` Roland Dreier
2009-05-26  4:36       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-26  6:29         ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  7:25           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-26  7:32             ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  7:38               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-26 14:47                 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-26 15:13                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-26 15:31                   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-26 16:05                     ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-27  1:36                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-27  7:54                         ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-27  8:26                           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-27  9:11                             ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-26 16:12                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-26 16:28                     ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-26  7:56               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-26  5:23     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-25  7:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 04/13] scsi: get rid of lock in __scsi_put_command() Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 04/12] writeback: switch to per-bdi threads for flushing data Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 05/13] aio: mostly crap Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  9:09   ` Jan Kara
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] writeback: get rid of pdflush completely Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 06/13] block: move elevator ops into the queue Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 06/12] writeback: separate the flushing state/task from the bdi Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 07/13] block: avoid indirect calls to enter cfq io scheduler Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:02   ` Nikanth K
2009-05-26  9:02     ` Nikanth K
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] writeback: support > 1 flusher thread per bdi Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: change the tag sync vs async restriction logic Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] writeback: include default_backing_dev_info in writeback Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 09/13] libata: switch to using block layer tagging support Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 09/12] writeback: allow sleepy exit of default writeback task Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: add function for waiting for a specific free tag Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 10/12] writeback: add some debug inode list counters to bdi stats Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 11/13] block: disallow merging of read-ahead bits into normal request Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 11/12] writeback: add name to backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 12/13] block: first cut at implementing a NAPI approach for block devices Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 12/12] writeback: check for registered bdi in flusher add and inode dirty Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:31 ` [PATCH 13/13] block: unlocked completion test patch Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:33 ` [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads #5 Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:34 Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  7:34 ` [PATCH 03/12] writeback: move dirty inodes from super_block to backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-05-25  8:42   ` Jan Kara
2009-05-25  8:51     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v7 Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 03/12] writeback: move dirty inodes from super_block to backing_dev_info Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1243236668-3398-7-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.