From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:49:07 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] Clean up top-level directory structure
In-Reply-To: <200907091357.52923.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1247152106-10678-1-git-send-email-ptyser@xes-inc.com>
	<200907091357.52923.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <1247165347.905.46.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de


> >   Move lib_ppc to lib/ppc
> >   Move lib_arm to lib/arm
> >   Move lib_i386 to lib/i386
> >   Move lib_m68k to lib/m68k
> >   Move remaining lib_<ARCH> to lib/<ARCH>
> 
> why is ppc/arm/i386/m68k special ?  seems like it'd make more sense to either 
> have one patch for every arch or squash them altogether.  a squash here sounds 
> ok to me.

I originally didn't squash them all together because of the 100KB
mailing list limit.  It looked like I'd need to only use 1 line of patch
context to get the lib_<arch> changes to be < 100KB, so I split them up
instead.

I originally was going to do each arch independently, but realized there
was no real significant change for avr32, blackfin, mips, nios, nios2,
and sparc so I squashed them together.

Anyway, that's the logic, I can resubmit if necessary.  Or the arch
changes can be squashed together by whoever pushes the changes to get
around the mailing list limit.

Peter