On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 17:31 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
[...]
> I'm wondering if it wouldn't be cleaner to fold the jump into
> sync_core() and moving the sync_core() up before local_irq_restore().

Exactly as I suggested below the dashes. :-)

The only reason I didn't do that initially was that I don't know whether
or not there's a good reason for the current placement of sync_core()
after local_irq_restore().

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Who are all these weirdos? - David Bowie, about L-Space IRC channel #afp