From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753981AbZKELAW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:00:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752311AbZKELAW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:00:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:58055 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752018AbZKELAV (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:00:21 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=A96k0644QFIW7fu/LVrJpXom+9PmlIr1qXcqr5blYY4/wxEfxz6TrVUybH1NIUyn46 lzWTAFTjbPPZyAEJQz7lL+ykelc9c+/KHrSv40geklWBlxZdmec0H9aVX+D4d0O9Olrg MwZES9X5uZQGTvMHgIiFHShBS2UQK3KjNREiU= Subject: Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support From: Wu Zhangjin Reply-To: wuzhangjin@gmail.com To: Ralf Baechle Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, LKML , huhb@lemote.com, yanh@lemote.com, Zhang Le , Thomas Gleixner , Nicholas Mc Guire , zhangfx@lemote.com, liujl@lemote.com In-Reply-To: <20091105102838.GF12582@linux-mips.org> References: <20091105091841.GC12582@linux-mips.org> <1257414523.1824.11.camel@falcon.domain.org> <20091105102838.GF12582@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: DSLab, Lanzhou University, China Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:00:16 +0800 Message-ID: <1257418816.3067.8.camel@falcon.domain.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > > > You're ifdefing on Loongson 2F - doesn't that mean that you can't have a > > > kernel that supports both Loongson 2E and 2F? > > > > > > > Currently, not consider it yet;) It's a little hard to cope with, should > > we consider it at this moment? if yes, I will try it with the help of > > exisiting machtype asap. but I think it's better to let it be the future > > job ;) > > Fair enough - though I'm sure Linux distributions would be happy to have > one kernel variant less to ship. > Yup, linux distributions will like it. but just remembered that: the instruciton set of loongson2e and loongson2f is different, -march=loongson2e, -march=loongson2f. so it will be not possible to merge them together, but I will try to merge the 2f support, so please wait for me merging fuloong2f & yeeloon2f, I will do it tonight, it is really an interesting job to do ;) Regards, Wu Zhangjin