From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753081Ab0CBRy7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:54:59 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:49986 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752382Ab0CBRy6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:54:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf_events, x86: Fixup fixed counter constraints From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:54:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1267552492.25158.71.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:26 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > @@ -37,14 +43,16 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_core2_event_constraints[] = > > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x18, 0x1), /* IDLE_DURING_DIV */ > > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x19, 0x2), /* DELAYED_BYPASS */ > > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xa1, 0x1), /* RS_UOPS_DISPATCH_CYCLES */ > > + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc9, 0x1), /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED (T30-9) */ > > Where does the constraint on ITLB_MISS_RETIRED come from? Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual Volume 3B: System Programming Guide, Part 2 Dec 2009 (253669) Section 30.4.3, Table 30-9