From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756134Ab0CDW24 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:28:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28155 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754525Ab0CDW2y (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:28:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 From: Adam Jackson To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Matthew Garrett , Dave Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net In-Reply-To: References: <20100304185002.GA23532@srcf.ucam.org> <20100304190450.GA23807@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv" Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:28:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1267741697.1316.16.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:=20 > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > If you'd made it clear that you wanted the interface to be stable=20 > > before it got merged, I suspect that it simply wouldn't have been merge= d=20 > > until the interface was stable. >=20 > What kind of excuse is that? It's "we did bad things, but if we didn't do= =20 > those bad things, we'd have done _other_ bad things"? >=20 > Two wrong choices don't make a right. So unmerge it. - ajax --=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuQNAAACgkQW4otUKDs0NNf0gCgnyFfhOz4+hSjKAR/OwDwnebh eZ0AniQDRIyTvy7IKLVYWfmBdSiOTLeh =bwK0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Jackson Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:28:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1267741697.1316.16.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> References: <20100304185002.GA23532@srcf.ucam.org> <20100304190450.GA23807@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1333448470139041139==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Dave Airlie , Matthew Garrett , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1333448470139041139== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv" --=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:=20 > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > If you'd made it clear that you wanted the interface to be stable=20 > > before it got merged, I suspect that it simply wouldn't have been merge= d=20 > > until the interface was stable. >=20 > What kind of excuse is that? It's "we did bad things, but if we didn't do= =20 > those bad things, we'd have done _other_ bad things"? >=20 > Two wrong choices don't make a right. So unmerge it. - ajax --=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuQNAAACgkQW4otUKDs0NNf0gCgnyFfhOz4+hSjKAR/OwDwnebh eZ0AniQDRIyTvy7IKLVYWfmBdSiOTLeh =bwK0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uPw9A73lFMj79koI8iwv-- --===============1333448470139041139== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev --===============1333448470139041139== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel --===============1333448470139041139==--