From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E38AC433ED for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82E3613B6 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:08:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242164AbhDMPIn (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:08:43 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:52741 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230327AbhDMPIk (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:08:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618326500; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EXfHI7Pi/+FuEoIu676iLq6Hjc+4w30CIrx+yrnJUyk=; b=Zz6iMBDTAHeWNaW0jgn5VjChX+Zj4dupDudmcZ9gFleptI1HvdkJZTC0fh88JpisPRj7uu x25UR3vXaaNjZ1O6vlai4MgltD+0IHNmUXr25HmOr2bK4ABSCNgntFsyIe0wZALHsvvN/j 5gJmwTI7577SM+aU3Uw9FND8bMzvXbM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-477-5PTN0ALPOXGi0mOkdxb0vg-1; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:08:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5PTN0ALPOXGi0mOkdxb0vg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B58DC107ACCA; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-119-35.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.119.35]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC82660DA0; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20210327035019.GG1719932@casper.infradead.org> <20210201130800.GP308988@casper.infradead.org> <2884397.1616584210@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1507388.1616833898@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20210327135659.GH1719932@casper.infradead.org> <20210327155630.GJ1719932@casper.infradead.org> <1720948.1617010659@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3726695.1617284551@warthog.procyon.org.uk > To: Mike Marshall Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Matthew Wilcox , linux-fsdevel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] implement orangefs_readahead MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1268213.1618326494.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:08:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1268214.1618326494@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Mike Marshall wrote: > Hi David... I've been gone on a motorcycle adventure, > sorry for the delay... here's my public branch... > = > https://github.com/hubcapsc/linux/tree/readahead_v3 That seems to have all of my fscache-iter branch in it. I thought you'd s= aid you'd dropped them because they were causing problems. Anyway, I've distilled the basic netfs lib patches, including the readahea= d expansion patch and ITER_XARRAY patch here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log= /?h=3Dnetfs-lib if that's of use to you? If you're using any of these patches, would it be possible to get a Tested= -by for them that I can add? David