All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase enqueue/dequeue fairness
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:18:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269379098.2915.34.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269377667.2915.25.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Le mardi 23 mars 2010 à 21:54 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> I wonder if ticket spinlocks are not the problem. Maybe we want a
> variant of spinlocks, so that cpu doing transmits can get the lock
> before other cpus...

Something like this portable implementation :

struct spinprio {
	spinlock_t	lock;
	int		highprio_cnt;
};

void spinprio_lock(struct spinprio *l)
{
	while (1) {
		spin_lock(&l->lock);
		if (!l->highprio_cnt)
			break;
		spin_unlock(&l->lock);
		cpu_relax();
	}
}

void spinprio_unlock(struct spinprio *l)
{
	spin_unlock(&l->lock);
}

void spinprio_relock(struct spinprio *l)
{
	l->highprio_cnt = 1;
	spin_lock(&l->lock);
	l->highprio_cnt = 0;
}

We would have to use spinprio_unlock()/spinprio_relock() in
sch_direct_xmit()




  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-23 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-23 20:25 [RFC PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase enqueue/dequeue fairness Alexander Duyck
2010-03-23 20:31 ` David Miller
2010-03-24  2:12   ` Andi Kleen
2010-03-23 20:40 ` Rick Jones
2010-03-23 20:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-23 21:18   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-03-23 21:45   ` David Miller
2010-03-23 22:08     ` Duyck, Alexander H
2010-03-24  2:58       ` David Miller
2010-03-24  5:42         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-24  6:10           ` David Miller
2010-03-23 22:13     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 15:43       ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-21 16:44         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 17:38           ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-21 17:40           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02  9:48             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02  9:49             ` [PATCH 1/2 net-next-2.6] net: Define accessors to manipulate QDISC_STATE_RUNNING Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 10:24               ` David Miller
2010-06-02  9:50             ` [PATCH 2/2 net-next-2.6] net: QDISC_STATE_RUNNING dont need atomic bit ops Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 10:25               ` David Miller
2010-03-24 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase enqueue/dequeue fairness Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 15:08 ` [PATCH] net: add additional lock to qdisc to increase throughput Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 20:04   ` Duyck, Alexander H
2010-06-02 12:10     ` David Miller
2010-06-02 14:52       ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1269379098.2915.34.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.