From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NxRa4-0007ZM-1Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:05:36 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50996 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxRa0-0007YV-1z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:05:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxRZy-00008M-1h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:05:31 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:57462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxRZx-000080-IY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:05:30 -0400 From: Stefan Weil Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:05:14 +0200 Message-Id: <1270155914-21047-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <1269890225-13639-10-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> References: <1269890225-13639-10-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-mips: Fix format specifiers for fpu_fprintf List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: QEMU Developers In the previous patch which introduced fprintf_function to allow parameter checking by gcc some compiler warnings remained unfixed. These warnings are fixed here. Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil --- target-mips/translate.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/target-mips/translate.c b/target-mips/translate.c index 02367e4..61f8d72 100644 --- a/target-mips/translate.c +++ b/target-mips/translate.c @@ -9563,20 +9563,26 @@ static void fpu_dump_state(CPUState *env, FILE *f, int i; int is_fpu64 = !!(env->hflags & MIPS_HFLAG_F64); -#define printfpr(fp) \ - do { \ - if (is_fpu64) \ - fpu_fprintf(f, "w:%08x d:%016lx fd:%13g fs:%13g psu: %13g\n", \ - (fp)->w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], (fp)->d, (fp)->fd, \ - (fp)->fs[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], (fp)->fs[!FP_ENDIAN_IDX]); \ - else { \ - fpr_t tmp; \ - tmp.w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX] = (fp)->w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX]; \ - tmp.w[!FP_ENDIAN_IDX] = ((fp) + 1)->w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX]; \ - fpu_fprintf(f, "w:%08x d:%016lx fd:%13g fs:%13g psu:%13g\n", \ - tmp.w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], tmp.d, tmp.fd, \ - tmp.fs[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], tmp.fs[!FP_ENDIAN_IDX]); \ - } \ +#define printfpr(fp) \ + do { \ + if (is_fpu64) \ + fpu_fprintf(f, "w:%08x d:%016" PRIx64 \ + " fd:%13g fs:%13g psu: %13g\n", \ + (fp)->w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], (fp)->d, \ + (double)(fp)->fd, \ + (double)(fp)->fs[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], \ + (double)(fp)->fs[!FP_ENDIAN_IDX]); \ + else { \ + fpr_t tmp; \ + tmp.w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX] = (fp)->w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX]; \ + tmp.w[!FP_ENDIAN_IDX] = ((fp) + 1)->w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX]; \ + fpu_fprintf(f, "w:%08x d:%016" PRIx64 \ + " fd:%13g fs:%13g psu:%13g\n", \ + tmp.w[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], tmp.d, \ + (double)tmp.fd, \ + (double)tmp.fs[FP_ENDIAN_IDX], \ + (double)tmp.fs[!FP_ENDIAN_IDX]); \ + } \ } while(0) -- 1.7.0