From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:44891 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933038Ab0DHVSJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 17:18:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 007/102] ath9k_hw: AR9003 does not have AR_RC_AHB skip its setting From: Pavel Roskin To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1270754858-26266-8-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> References: <1270754858-26266-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1270754858-26266-8-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:18:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1270761488.16012.11.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:26 -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > AR9003 does not have a reset control for AHB. ... > + val = AR_RC_HOSTIF; > + if (!AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah)) > + val |= AR_RC_AHB; Perhaps AR_RC_AHB could be defined to 0 for AR9300 in the header? Just an idea. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin