From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:32:27 +0200
Message-ID: <1271399547.16881.3724.camel@edumazet-laptop>
References: <t2p65634d661004141031xf80f62e7sb64362ea1ce10a1f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1271268242.16881.1719.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	 <1271271222.4567.51.camel@bigi>
	 <20100415.014857.168270765.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <1271332528.4567.150.camel@bigi>  <4BC741AE.3000108@hp.com>
	 <1271362581.23780.12.camel@bigi>
	 <n2p412e6f7f1004151656q5f3f2cbeh324a859b88688398@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1271395106.16881.3645.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	 <o2v412e6f7f1004152302j1aca5edam9d53d01781ddbe9d@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, therbert@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, robert@herjulf.net, andi@firstfloor.org
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:47082 "EHLO
	mail-bw0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752314Ab0DPGch (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:32:37 -0400
Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so2571900bwz.28
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <o2v412e6f7f1004152302j1aca5edam9d53d01781ddbe9d@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 =C3=A0 14:02 +0800, Changli Gao a =C3=A9crit =
:

> resched IPI, apparently. But it is async absolutely. and its IRQ
> handler is lighter.
>=20

You still dont answer to the question, and your claims are not grounded
by hard facts, but by your interpretation of code.