From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:31:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-px0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:39346 "EHLO mail-px0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491961Ab0FQNbm (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:31:42 +0200 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so330604pxi.36 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:31:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mpmLSrFrxLLGKuOa+Ja7LU3tsSCX14otThduPLbk0KA=; b=M9puIsBF7LIYKjCumII3P2zmjtu5tVTYk0N+xHMxRRPcxY5e50154bkuxxZqwtPIHe 54ZaC2uHckgC4K7NMgZPejsnO/BUGik9nMrEwuF2Fiai0s7eyWDZJsAIW6pG6DJQGlJf LyMKyvctiogIeG3QtOMGYndkPYYav1P5VLgGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=Ep7cwBswAFxYRzFy2YERDv3wr/FNEZF0BXmbE49RZTdbGFdhCLociiDxOyi3qrUcmn AhmN/jj/N81jaU9X+Lj6VN/oRCtX6QXRSqfuZGoB/Nnyi2+GlSv866gxiL7zI6BVpjyW NW4Z1h/LBJhhAIp5hLmxmiUVfd+FJiOfjjT0E= Received: by 10.115.39.8 with SMTP id r8mr8265580waj.228.1276781495490; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.106] ([182.18.29.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c22sm95419439wam.6.2010.06.17.06.31.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: zboot for brcm From: Wu Zhangjin Reply-To: wuzhangjin@gmail.com To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Waldemar Brodkorb , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips In-Reply-To: <201006171438.15832.florian@openwrt.org> References: <20100609153831.GA27461@waldemar-brodkorb.de> <1276179278.21482.16.camel@localhost> <201006171438.15832.florian@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: DSLab, Lanzhou University, China Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:31:19 +0800 Message-ID: <1276781479.4271.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 27160 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: wuzhangjin@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: X-Keywords: X-UID: 12044 Hi, On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 14:38 +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday 17 June 2010 14:20:49 wu zhangjin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just got a bcm1250a board, it also uses the CFE as the bootloader, I > > compiled a compressed vmlinuz-2.6.34 for it and boot with the > > following command, it works well: > > > > CFE> setenv bootargs root=/dev/nfs rw > > nfsroot=$nfs_server_ip:/path/to/nfs_root_fs ip=dhcp > > CFE> ifconfig -auto eth0 > > CFE> boot -elf $tftp_server_ip:/path/to/vmlinuz > > > > With -elf, the boot command of CFE can parse the vmlinuz and boot it > > normally. I think you have used the wrong options of the boot command. > > CFE on bcm12xx, on bcm47xx and bcm63xx are all three slightly different flavors > which may not behave exactly the same way wrt the load command. > > Also, you are on a development board so there are no reasons to restrict CFE > commands, this is not the case with end-user products like WRT54G and such. Hmm, Maybe, I have no such products to test, anybody have such products, welcome to test it ;) Best Regards, Wu Zhangjin