All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Richard Farina <sidhayn@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: intel 5100/iwlagn bug in 2.6.35-rc2 during large file transfer
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:13:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1277399636.25793.2389.camel@rchatre-DESK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2383E2.8000909@gmail.com>

Hi Richard,

On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 09:12 -0700, Richard Farina wrote:
> reinette chatre wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:56 -0700, Richard Farina wrote:
> >   
> >> The repeated line appears ad infinitum filling my dmesg buffer.  This of 
> >> hangcheck timer seem to trigger with every large file transfer on my 
> >> intel 5100.  What would you like me to do to provide a more useful 
> >> output as this is currently extremely easy to reproduce.  Kernel 2.6.34 
> >> using compat-wireless stable 2.6.35-rc2
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rick Farina
> >>
> >> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
> >> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
> >> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
> >> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
> >> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
> >> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
> >> phy0: failed to reallocate TX buffer
> >>     
> >
> > First mac80211 runs out of memory ... it cannot even allocate enough
> > memory for a skb header.
> >
> >   
> >> net_ratelimit: 22 callbacks suppressed
> >> __alloc_pages_slowpath: 3799 callbacks suppressed
> >> swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
> >> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-pentoo #5
> >> Call Trace:
> >>  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8109cb74>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x571/0x5b9
> >>  [<ffffffff816732e9>] ? skb_release_data+0xc4/0xc9
> >>  [<ffffffffa04701e4>] iwlagn_rx_allocate+0x98/0x25a [iwlagn]
> >>     
> >
> > Next driver runs out of memory.
> >
> > Note that the above are all atomic allocations that fail and should be
> > able to recover. 
> >
> > Is your system low on memory? Are you running applications that take a
> > lot of memory? Does your wifi connection drop or otherwise suffer at the
> > time you see these messages?
> >
> >   
> I have 4GB of RAM on this system, I often run a VM which wastes like 
> half that but that still leaves 2GB for linux and I'm running XFCE4 so 
> not exactly a memory hog. It's possible that firefox leaks ram until I'm 
> out but that would be a LOT of leak, much more than I usually see.

There has been an issue with atomic memory allocations ever since
2.6.31. This used to be easy to trigger with iwlagn, but we fixed a
number of issues. There are still issue with any atomic memory
allocation (not just iwlagn) and this issue is still open. You can find
more information at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141

> Yeah, as you may guess these errors cause my wifi connection to slow 
> drastically.

The driver, when unable to allocate memory atomically, will reattempt
the allocation later when it can use GFP_KERNEL. I think there may be
ways in which we can try to optimize this since right now it will only
schedule this when there are about 8 buffers remaining. I was looking at
your trace again and even though you state "Kernel 2.6.34 using
compat-wireless stable 2.6.35-rc2" ... the trace you provide does not
seem to match the driver code from 2.6.35-rc2. Could you please confirm
which version of driver you are running so that I can prepare a patch?

>  If I had to guess, since this happens when I make a large 
> file transfer it is likely that something related is leaking RAM.  I'm 
> using wget or axel to download and NFS to dump the files on a NAS.  I'll 
> try to trigger this again

Does this happen every time you run this test? I would like to get an
idea whether we will get a clear indication whether our changes will
help or not.

>  and watch memory usage to see if I can find 
> something other than the driver that could be leaking.  Failing that, 
> what do I need to enable to find a leak in the driver?

Perhaps kmemleak?

Reinette




  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-24 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-17  2:56 intel 5100/iwlagn bug in 2.6.35-rc2 during large file transfer Richard Farina
2010-06-17 23:35 ` Richard Farina
2010-06-22 16:48 ` reinette chatre
2010-06-24 16:12   ` Richard Farina
2010-06-24 17:13     ` reinette chatre [this message]
2010-06-24 17:30       ` Richard Farina
2010-06-24 17:48         ` reinette chatre
2010-06-25 16:28           ` Richard Farina
2010-06-25 18:57             ` reinette chatre
2010-06-27 17:14               ` Richard Farina
2010-06-28 16:27                 ` reinette chatre
2010-06-28 17:01                   ` Richard Farina
2010-06-28 20:39                     ` reinette chatre
2010-06-29  3:57                       ` Richard Farina
2010-06-30 23:32                         ` reinette chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1277399636.25793.2389.camel@rchatre-DESK \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sidhayn@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.