From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx3-v2.alinto.net (mx3-v2.alinto.net [83.145.109.33]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1281963344.4c69355004f56@www.inmano.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:55:44 +0200 From: octane indice In-Reply-To: <20100815221051.GA13494@tansi.org> References: <20100726210741.GC24052@tansi.org> <1280180557.3266.136.camel@fermat.scientia.net> <4C682354.50907@web.de> <20100815221051.GA13494@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Efficacy of xts over 1TB List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Arno Wagner Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de En r=E9ponse =E0 Arno Wagner : > Well, if the attacker mirrors your network traffic with iSCSI, > encryption does not matter anymore for any change analysis. > I don't know if it is the right place to ask, but do you have any links with this "change analysis" thing ? Thanks=20 I.Octane =20 > _______________________________________________ >=20 Envoy=E9 avec Inmano, ma messagerie renversante et gratuite : http://www.in= mano.com