* [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
@ 2010-08-19 15:15 Andreas Schwab
2010-08-19 17:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-08-19 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linuxppc-dev
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h | 5 ++++-
arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c | 8 ++++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
index a5ee345..3d21266 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
@@ -326,3 +326,6 @@ SYSCALL_SPU(perf_event_open)
COMPAT_SYS_SPU(preadv)
COMPAT_SYS_SPU(pwritev)
COMPAT_SYS(rt_tgsigqueueinfo)
+SYSCALL(fanotify_init)
+COMPAT_SYS(fanotify_mark)
+SYSCALL_SPU(prlimit64)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
index f0a1026..597e6f9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
@@ -345,10 +345,13 @@
#define __NR_preadv 320
#define __NR_pwritev 321
#define __NR_rt_tgsigqueueinfo 322
+#define __NR_fanotify_init 323
+#define __NR_fanotify_mark 324
+#define __NR_prlimit64 325
#ifdef __KERNEL__
-#define __NR_syscalls 323
+#define __NR_syscalls 326
#define __NR__exit __NR_exit
#define NR_syscalls __NR_syscalls
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c
index 20fd701..b1b6043 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c
@@ -616,3 +616,11 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_sync_file_range2(int fd, unsigned int flags,
return sys_sync_file_range(fd, offset, nbytes, flags);
}
+
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_fanotify_mark(int fanotify_fd, unsigned int flags,
+ unsigned mask_hi, unsigned mask_lo,
+ int dfd, const char __user *pathname)
+{
+ u64 mask = ((u64)mask_hi << 32) | mask_lo;
+ return sys_fanotify_mark(fanotify_fd, flags, mask, dfd, pathname);
+}
--
1.7.2.1
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
2010-08-19 15:15 [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls Andreas Schwab
@ 2010-08-19 17:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-19 22:19 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2010-08-19 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Linuxppc-dev, Andreas Schwab
On Thursday 19 August 2010 17:15:37 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> +SYSCALL(fanotify_init)
> +COMPAT_SYS(fanotify_mark)
why not _SPU? If it doesn't depend on getting signals,
SPUs should be able to use it.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
2010-08-19 17:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2010-08-19 22:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-08-23 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-08-19 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: Linuxppc-dev, linuxppc-dev
Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@googlemail.com> writes:
> On Thursday 19 August 2010 17:15:37 Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> +SYSCALL(fanotify_init)
>> +COMPAT_SYS(fanotify_mark)
>
> why not _SPU?
See arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.
* 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
* linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall
* helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary
* opd symbols:
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
2010-08-19 22:19 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2010-08-23 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-24 6:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2010-08-23 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Linuxppc-dev, Arnd Bergmann, Andreas Schwab
On Friday 20 August 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> See arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.
>
> * 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
> * linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall
> * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary
> * opd symbols:
Right. I should blame the person that wrote this comment.
If only I could remember who that was.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
2010-08-23 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2010-08-24 6:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-24 7:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2010-08-24 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: Linuxppc-dev, Andreas Schwab, Arnd Bergmann, linuxppc-dev
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > See arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.
> >
> > * 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
> > * linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall
> > * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary
> > * opd symbols:
>
> Right. I should blame the person that wrote this comment.
> If only I could remember who that was.
Regardless of the outcome of that, I'm merging Andreas patch. We can
always add SPU bindings if we feel like it later.
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls
2010-08-24 6:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2010-08-24 7:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2010-08-24 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Linuxppc-dev, Andreas Schwab, Arnd Bergmann, linuxppc-dev
On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 20 August 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > See arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_callbacks.c.
> > >
> > > * 4. They are optional and we can't rely on them being
> > > * linked into the kernel. Unfortunately, the cond_syscall
> > > * helper does not work here as it does not add the necessary
> > > * opd symbols:
> >
> > Right. I should blame the person that wrote this comment.
> > If only I could remember who that was.
>
> Regardless of the outcome of that, I'm merging Andreas patch. We can
> always add SPU bindings if we feel like it later.
Sorry, I should have added a ';-)' or been clearer. The patch is good,
I wrote the comment that Andreas quoted and it's probably my own fault
that we never found a way to handle syscalls like this correctly from
the SPU.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-24 7:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-19 15:15 [PATCH] [powerpc] Wire up fanotify_init, fanotify_mark, prlimit64 syscalls Andreas Schwab
2010-08-19 17:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-19 22:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-08-23 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-08-24 6:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-24 7:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.