Re: [RFC patch 1/2] sched: dynamically adapt granularity with nr_running

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 13:37 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

Its not at all clear what or why you're doing what exactly.

What we used to have is:

  period -- time in which each task gets scheduled once

This period was adaptive in that we had an ideal period
(sysctl_sched_latency), but since keeping to this means that each task
gets latency/nr_running time. This is undesired in that it means busy
systems will over-schedule due to tiny slices. Hence we also had a
minimum slice (sysctl_sched_min_granularity).

This yields:

  period := max(sched_latency, nr_running * sched_min_granularity)

[ where we introduce the intermediate: 
	nr_latency := sched_latency / sched_min_granularity
  in order to avoid the multiplication where possible ]

Now you introduce a separate preemption measure, sched_gran as:

		  sched_std_granularity; nr_running <= 8
  sched_gran := {
		  max(sched_min_granularity, sched_latency / nr_running)

Which doesn't make any sense at all, because it will either be larger or
as large as the current sched_min_granularity.

And you break the above definition of period by replacing nr_latency by
8.

Not at all charmed, this look like random changes without conceptual
integrity.