From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752457Ab0IKUqH (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:46:07 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:60940 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751911Ab0IKUqG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:46:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/2] sched: dynamically adapt granularity with nr_running From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , LKML , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Tony Lindgren , Mike Galbraith In-Reply-To: <1284237380.2251.56.camel@laptop> References: <20100911173732.551632040@efficios.com> <20100911174003.051303123@efficios.com> <1284231470.2251.52.camel@laptop> <1284237380.2251.56.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:45:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1284237950.2251.59.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 22:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > But if you want us to change the scheduler to be more latency sensitive > and trade in throughput for other benchmarks, we can do that. Really, just say "latency trumps throughput" and we'll make it so.