All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: Cleanup BOOTFLAG_* usage
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:53:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284389585.26713.2967.camel@petert> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009130827.21823.sr@denx.de>

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 08:27 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Monday 13 September 2010 07:34:40 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > BOOTFLAG_COLD and BOOTFLAG_WARM have identical definitions for every
> > > PowerPC board, so share a common definition.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
> > > ---
> > > It looks like there are only a few boards (5) that use the warm/cold
> > > boot concept, maybe we should remove this largely unused feature?
> > > Or at least remove it for most CPU types?  Is anyone out there
> > > using it?
> > 
> > I added this with the very first versions of PPCBoot, more than a
> > decade ago. I've never seen it really used in the code.
> > 
> > I vote for removing it.
> 
> Me too:
> 
> Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>

Sounds good, I'll resubmit.  Getting rid of the BOOTFLAG_* defines will
make bd->bi_bootflags unused.  What's the policy on modifying the
bd_info structure?  Leave an unused bi_bootflags field to prevent
breakage of OSes?

Best,
Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-13 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-13  5:21 [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc: Cleanup BOOTFLAG_* usage Peter Tyser
2010-09-13  5:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-13  6:27   ` Stefan Roese
2010-09-13 14:53     ` Peter Tyser [this message]
2010-09-13 22:02       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-13 22:13         ` Scott Wood
2010-09-14  2:40           ` Peter Tyser
2010-10-12 20:49 ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1284389585.26713.2967.camel@petert \
    --to=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.