From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Shuklin Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:54:54 +0400 Message-ID: <1286470494.2916.25.camel@home.desunote.ru> References: <1286459012.23497.135.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1286461291.23155.20294.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1286461291.23155.20294.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 07/10/2010 =D0=B2 15:21 +0100, Ian Campbell =D0= =BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:43 +0100, George Shuklin wrote: > > Please note this bug: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D595711 > >=20 > > This behavior confirmed in lenny and squeeze. Kernel is very unstable > > (compare to centos/suse) and cause OOM killer without any rational > > reason. >=20 > I wasn't aware that this issue was present on Squeeze as well as Lenny, > there is no mention of that in the bug. >=20 > The two kernels have practically nothing in common wrt the Xen port > (Lenny was classic-Xen patch based and Squeeze is pvops based) so if yo= u > are seeing something similar under Squeeze as well please file a > separate bug report. OK, I'll recheck bug in squeeze and report it separately. Main problem for this bug is very high value of free memory when OOM killer starts. In my tests it appear when about 300MiB was free. And it kill not most 'badness' process, but runs repeatedly for few (or even all) process.=20 But, again, I'll recheck it in clean environment with reproducible behavior and submit it.