From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752558Ab0JPCLc (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:11:32 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:47299 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752348Ab0JPCLc (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:11:32 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=exbvkCqEOBXDkHq+8n3wanotOBQtbe7qbIajSD+JluU= c=1 sm=0 a=JTWUBG3XEXkA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=knYdJiMsgPGpYvN2KBAA:9 a=KWci5k1kjoSFv4RLOcAA:7 a=VfW8YDS3eCYEI1BsfdxTfwHfIWsA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] jump label: Add register_jump_label_key/unregister_jump_label_key From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker , Jason Baron In-Reply-To: <1287176290.1998.114.camel@laptop> References: <20101015200949.134732894@goodmis.org> <20101015201036.923619508@goodmis.org> <1287176290.1998.114.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:11:30 -0400 Message-ID: <1287195090.16971.40.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 22:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > static inline void jump_label_lock(void) {} > > static inline void jump_label_unlock(void) {} > > +static inline void register_jump_label_key(unsigned long key) {} > > +static inline void unregister_jump_label_key(unsigned long key) {} > > > shouldn't we call that jump_label_register_key() and co? I believe a lot of code has register/unregister first in its name. -- Steve