From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.19.149.2]:38194 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753027Ab0KLC13 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:27:29 -0500 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.105]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:27:17 -0800 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: CC: , , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Subject: [PATCH] cfg80211: Fix regulatory bug with multiple cards with a delayed CRDA response Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:27:23 -0800 Message-ID: <1289528843-21982-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: When two cards are connected with the same regulatory domain if CRDA had a delayed response then cfg80211's own set regulatory domain would still be the world regulatory domain. There was a bug on cfg80211's ignore_request() when analyzing incoming driver regulatory hints as it was only checking against the currently set cfg80211 regulatory domain and not for any other new pending requests. This is easily fixed by also checking against the pending request. Without this fix the second card would end up with an intersected regulatory domain and now allow it to use the channels it really is designed for. This was reproduced and tested against mac80211_hwsim using this CRDA delayer: #!/bin/bash echo $COUNTRY >> /tmp/log sleep 2 /sbin/crda.orig And this regulatory test: modprobe mac80211_hwsim regtest=2 This patch has fixes for cfg80211 all the way back. Reported-by: Mark Mentovai Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez --- net/wireless/reg.c | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/wireless/reg.c b/net/wireless/reg.c index 3be18d9..ecac993 100644 --- a/net/wireless/reg.c +++ b/net/wireless/reg.c @@ -1281,9 +1281,13 @@ static int ignore_request(struct wiphy *wiphy, * This would happen if you unplug and plug your card * back in or if you add a new device for which the previously * loaded card also agrees on the regulatory domain. + * This can also happen if you have two cards both with the + * same regulatory domain and CRDA hasn't yet replied back + * with the last request's regulatory domain. */ if (last_request->initiator == NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_DRIVER && - !regdom_changes(pending_request->alpha2)) + (!regdom_changes(pending_request->alpha2) || + alpha2_equal(last_request->alpha2, pending_request->alpha2))) return -EALREADY; return REG_INTERSECT; -- 1.7.1